I strongly support replacing FS4 at the current location. The alternative "Site C" (Loma Linda Park) is not appropriate for 3 reasons: 1) Impact of 24 hour operations (sound and light) on the adjacent neighborhood, 2)Poor vehicle access via a steep 2-lane road with limited visibility, and 3)Removal of zoned park land when other alternatives (current location) are viable and better. More discussion and similar comments are documented in the Public Comment Matrix.
I favor replacing on the current site & I request that the Council challenge the staff to do what is needed within the existing parcel footprint. I went to a meeting & the main reason I heard for the idea of encroaching into adjacent lands was to accommodate police department use which seems like project creep. Please be creative & keep it compact! The 2 other sites considered are inappropriate for the fire station use- they already have open space uses. OPEN SPACE IS NOT LAND FOR DEVELOPMENT
I strongly support replacing FS4 at the current location. The alternative "Site C" (Loma Linda Park) is not appropriate for 3 reasons: 1) Impact of 24 hour operations (sound and light) on the adjacent neighborhood, 2)Poor vehicle access via a steep 2-lane road with limited visibility, and 3)Removal of zoned park land when other alternatives (current location) are viable and better. More discussion and similar comments are documented in the Public Comment Matrix.
I favor replacing on the current site & I request that the Council challenge the staff to do what is needed within the existing parcel footprint. I went to a meeting & the main reason I heard for the idea of encroaching into adjacent lands was to accommodate police department use which seems like project creep. Please be creative & keep it compact! The 2 other sites considered are inappropriate for the fire station use- they already have open space uses. OPEN SPACE IS NOT LAND FOR DEVELOPMENT